Hello Good Adjuncts,
Sorry I’ve been gone for over three months from the site. Like the rest of you, I’ve been a bit busy, but I’ve tried to address the adjunct issue these past few months more directly through union and political involvement.
This brings me to the thing that I think we, as adjuncts, can do to begin being effecting change immediately.
Start publically and factually talking about our salaries
This past Spring, a retired but returned former full-time colleague of mine began talking salaries, and told me, that in spite of his longstanding sympathy for adjuncts, he hadn’t really gotten the message of how our salaries are, to be polite, “deficient”, until he started getting paid in adjunct wages.
You see, my colleague, who retired from San Diego Mesa College as head of the English Department in 2003, was making $86,000/year in his final year. He then went on for a number of years being paid “pro rata”, which meant he would teach two classes paid on a graduated scale proportionate to what he had made as a full-timer. However, “pro rata” status doesn’t continue forever, and so eventually he saw his pay reduced to the standard adjunct rate for a person of his experience and educational attainment. He saw his wages cut to almost a third of what he was making.
As an adjunct at San Diego Mesa College, I now make $67.10 an hour. Because I have taught three classes a semester for over ten years, I am at the top of the pay scale for people with a MA and 60 Postgraduate units. This coming academic year, I will teach six three-unit (3hr/wk) classes which run 16 weeks. If one multiplies $67.10 X 6 X 3 X 16, this will come to $19,324.80. If I were to teach a full-time load of ten three-unit classes, my pay for the year would be $32208.00.
For a person of my experience and educational attainment, were I actually working as a full-time contracted employee, I would make, (being on Step M of Schedule A), $6,290.00 a month on a ten-month contract for an annual total of $62,900.00, excluding Health Insurance, which thanks to my union, I also receive.
In other words, I make approximately 51.3 % of what my comparable full-time colleague makes. In fact, if I had really started as a full-timer, I would have actually accumulated an additional 144 units putting me at Step X, which means I would receive $8,477.00/month for an annual salary of $84,770.00. In fact, I really am getting paid 37.9 % of what my comparable full-time colleague makes.
As an adjunct at Southwestern Community College, I am paid better on an hourly basis, but receive no benefits with lesser job security. At Southwestern I am paid $75.70/hr. I teach two four-unit classes per semester for 8 hours a week for two 18.5 week semesters. My annual salary from Southwestern next year will be $75.70 X 8 X 2 X 18.5, which comes to $22,407.00. If I worked I to work a full-time load at this rate, I would make 42,013.50 annually. The actual salary for a full-time contracted employee with comparable experience and educational attainment (Step 12 Class IV) would be $82, 405/yr., not including HW and welfare benefits. Adjuncts, if they receive any HW benefits from any other place of work, receive no benefits, and in fact, will only receive percentage pay on any health plan (i.e. 20% pay for a 20% load). Excluding benefits and just going by salary, Southwestern College pays me 51.2% of the salary a comparable full-time colleague makes.
Now granted, I do not have outside committee work like my full-time colleagues, but I have sat on academic committees, participated on an academic senate as an adjunct rep for five years, and participate in department meetings (unlike some of my full-time colleagues). I easily exceed 40 hours of work a semester on professional development, none of which I am compensated for. I have consistently positive evaluations at both institutions.
I ask therefore, how is my work worth 37.9%, 51.2%, or even 51.3% of a full-time contract employee’s, especially when I face the loss of work from even one bad evaluation cycle, or a downturn in funding?
If the above facts don’t point out the glaring inequities of the system, I don’t know what does or will.
So I say, good adjuncts, speak of your salaries, what you do make, what your colleagues both full-time and adjunct make, and of the sharp disparities. Do it in emails, to your colleagues, to governing boards, to the editorial sections of newspapers and blogs.
Maybe then the larger academic community, and perhaps more importantly, the public will finally “get it.”
A Good Adjunct in Search of Pay Parity
I totally agree. Most people don’t understand parity pay or even pro rata pay. All they hear is that you are making $75/hour which seems to most “regular” people or the public to be a lot of money. They don’t understand it in terms of work load and comparison with FT faculty. In general most PT faculty are earning $.55 cents on the dollar compared with FT — this has really not changed much since CPEC did their PT salary study in 2001. Some districts have made major strides are almost at parity with FT faculty for equal duties. In my district parity is set at 75% of FT (not including office time or professional obligations). I earn (and am in phd column, step 17 out of 22) 63% parity compared with my FT counterparts.
I would like the public and legislators to note that WOMEN in the general workforce (a major national discussion) earn around $.78 cents on the dollar compared with men. I would jump up and down if I got $.78 cents on the dollar or 78% pro rata pay with the expectations to do FTE duties.
Frankly, PT parity both in pay and duties (most are not required to do office time) is a fraud against the state (tax paying citizens and students). Students are required to pay the same fees regardless if the courses are taught by FT or PT, yet they are not receiving equal access or opportunities. This is fraud! All faculty and labor organizations need to call out the legislators and administrators about this issue. We need to get students riled up and willing to SUE for return of their fees or only pay proportional fees as based upon the PT paid parity.
It is time that we makes lots of noise about the FRAUD being perpetrated against students. We need to make the argument for parity based upon the students’ rights to an equal education by a faculty who are treated/paid equally and with equal responsibilities and qualifications.
I think you’re right. We need to recruit students and connect students’ rights with justice for adjuncts. One difficulty we adjuncts have is that we sacrifice ourselves trying to provide students with an equal education; of course, no matter how hard we try, no matter how good we are at teaching, the circumstance of being adjunct, with limited or no office space, mostly unpaid office hours, and limited institutional support in most places in almost every way, makes it impossible to offer students the same experience. In the classroom, yes, but, as we know, most of the work, including face time with students, takes place outside the classroom. We must continue to speak out, agitate, reach out, and organize. Thanks for your great comment.