NAWD at San Diego Mesa College this year had an expansive theme. The college president, a board member, and the president of the academic senate all spoke to adjunctification as well as the need to protect DACA students, and resist the hate emanating from the insane clown presidency. The intrepid Geoff Johnson kicked off the event, pointing out the ongoing human cost of the exploitation of adjunct faculty, emphasizing the cost to students, that 60% of adjuncts are women, and that many adjuncts live impoverished lives. Students were engaged and informed. The fight goes on.
By reading my last post, some readers may assume that I don’t believe a real adjunct walkout could or should happen.
Nothing could be further from the truth.
My point regarding Adjunct Walkout Day in my last entry was that it is both simplistic and defeatist to assume one can simply pull off a walkout without considering all that would be involved.
Unlike the Women’s marches which “benefited” from the fact that just a day earlier, the most divisive, bigoted and bombastic politician in recent memory was assuming the highest office in the land despite losing the popular vote by 2.9 million votes, adjunct actions are limited by the fact that adjunctification is largely treated as the dirty little secret of academia, with the workforce highly marginalized, and under the constant threat of loss of employment for even minor infractions. Further, there are so many forms of adjuntification/contingency that it can at time be that adjunct/contingent groups fighting for change can find themselves at cross purposes.
Another point to make is that the Women’s march is literally the start of a broad-based movement, which will in time face challenges from division, to marginalization, to a loss of enthusiasm, etc.
That said, the Women’s March should serve as an inspiration for adjunct to think in terms of mass action.
To achieve a mass walkout of adjuncts, even on a local scale, there must be a both a common sense of alienation coupled with an equally strong sense of moral outrage. I think to an extent, this is there, but there isn’t this common sense of what to do.
Second, and perhaps more importantly, adjuncts are fearful of reprisals from loss of employment to punitive scheduling, to even a simple reprimand. As so many adjuncts are effectively just “hanging on” in terms of income because these reprisals could lead to the loss of their homes, impacting not just themselves, but their families.
Further, because unions can’t legally call for or advocate strikes unless they have exhausted negotiations with a particular management group and not only declared impasse, but held a strike vote in which the majority of the membership authorized a strike, the union cannot protect workers who participate in a walkout, nor can it officially call for one.
But this doesn’t mean a walkout couldn’t happen.
Here’s when any adjunct who might be thinking of a walkout needs to read their contact carefully.
Most adjuncts have, as a part of their language, a sick leave policy granting them time away from work. In many cases, the taking of sick leave, if for a very short period of time, does not require a doctor’s note. This effectively means that you could leave or miss work without reprisal (with the assumption that you’re sick).
Imagine, if you will, a day in which even 50% of an adjunct teaching force suddenly got ill.
On January 11th, 2016, frustrated with the dilapidated conditions of the facilities they were teaching in school teachers in the Detroit Public System staged a sickout which garnered national attention. This action was followed up by a sick-out in early May which ultimately resulted in pay guarantees for its teachers.
Perhaps what the adjunct/contingent nation needs to do is consider this as an option.
But saying this and doing it are two different things. Some things to consider:
1) There has to be buy-in: There is, at any school, or district, a dedicated core of individuals who are willing to take the risk, and after them perhaps double the number who will talk a good game, or show interest, but then not act, and often, both groups combined, at best, represent only 10% of the adjunct faculty. To get larger participation, there needs to be either a greater sense of outrage or injustice, and perhaps more importantly, a sense that by doing the action it will actually accomplish something.
2) There needs to be a specific goal: What is the objective of a walkout going to be? It has to be more than “see how powerful adjuncts are,” or an abstract call for “adjunct justice”. There needs to be a clear sense of objectives that can be realized, like pressure on considering specific legislation, or certain policies. If it’s a national sickout, then it should focus a specific national issue, like unemployment benefits, healthcare, the WEP provision, etc. If it’s a state level sickout, it needs to be connected to a state level issue, like funding for office hours, or equity pay, but this said…
3) There need to be allies among students, politicians, and the general public: Given the current lack of awareness among students of who or what adjunct/contingent faculty really are, and how adjunct/contingent working conditions hinder student success, there’s a considerable amount of awareness raising that needs to go on. Personally, I’ve seen awareness and consciousness rise among students, but not enough so that there is widespread concern among student groups. There has to come a day when you can ask students in a given class, “Do you know what an adjunct is?” and have more than 50% of the class actually know and have a strong opinion about it. Again, this gets back to the fact that adjunct/contingent faculty by and large avoid explaining who they are to their students. As people in the business of attacking ignorance, it’s so ironic how many adjuncts contribute to it when it comes to the fact of being adjunct.
Politicians are not much different, and in fact, a bit worse. Since the Reagan administration, teachers have been one of America’s favorite whipping horses as to the ills of American society, and the college professor is still by and large perceived as some sort of upper-middle class elite who drives a nice sensible car and looks down on less-educated Americans. Further, we’re “impractical,” “we don’t know the “real world.” On the other hand, when it is acknowledged that many of us are financially struggling and live with employment insecurity, we are told by these same politicians, that it’s simply the market economy (even though many of us have full and overflowing classes), or that if we don’t like it, we should just quit, as if the 50+ year-old adjunct with an advanced degree is some sort of versatile property that can pick up a job a will. Further, this is not a Republican or Democrat thing. In fact, some Democrats have been even worse in their embrace of the Corporatization of Public Education. They often call for “school choice,” “charter school,” or speak of free Public Higher Ed (itself a worthy goal) but not a lick about improving the working conditions of the people who deliver that education. There are politicians who do get it, like California State Assemblyman Jose Medina, but we need to bring these people up, and some of us need to run for office ourselves.
Adjunct and Contingents, as for the general public, how many of you talk about the work and salary conditions you experience among friends and neighbors? By the way, when was the last time you saw an adjunct represented on TV or in a movie, and moreover, was there any mention of their lack of income, job security, or how students were affected by this? News stories on NPR, MSNBC, or the Nightly News aren’t going to be enough. We have to create a culture and have a presence in media where by our situation is known.
4) We need full-time allies who will stand with us: An adjunct walkout can work if full-time support is there, but we need to have support that is significant. Maybe they need to walk out with us, or stand up to administrators who will seek to sanction by simply leaving us off the schedule the following semester. It would also be nice if they weren’t afraid of us “taking over,” which is something I hear more often than I would like. I will say this, unless a concerted effort is made to de-incentivize the hiring of adjunct/contingent faculty, the tenure system will collapse, and for any adjunct foolish enough to think this would be a good thing, think again: it would effectively mean an end to academic freedom. Then you can face the risk of getting fired without cause, or for showing your student a film about income inequality or racism that they’re not down with. Adjuncts need to fight and stand for full-time positions, but at the same time full-timers need to realize that pay and benefit equity for adjuncts is the price for protecting tenure.
5) Any kind of sickout has to be a mass movement of leaders in smaller groups or cells, not something directed by a singular group of activists: As I already stated, union leaders by and large have their hands tied in calling for or directing such actions. Even smaller activist organizations with visible leadership need to be aware that without mass support and protection, they face retaliation, which is fine if they’re willing to carry the costs of losing their jobs or careers, and subsequently labeled a martyr or symbol for the cause. Some people can do this, and we can applaud them for their sacrifice. For others, mass action can provide both the support and anonymity to act. The idea of a sickout can be spread through word of mouth, and when consensus is realized then people can act.
6) We need the support of those adjuncts who can’t, for whatever reason, join the sickout, and we need to support them: Any kind of strong labor action is a scary thing. For many adjunct/contingents living from paycheck-to-paycheck, and even then not making it, such an action is frightening. Some adjuncts feel bound to their students (though a sickout can very much be a teachable moment). These are our brothers and sisters, and they can stand with us, speaking out as to why have chosen to act. They can share in the communication of our grievances and our demands for redress. If we know that they understand our actions and stand with us otherwise, then we must embrace them.
And there you have it. This is what it’s going to take to have the walkout/sickout/whatever . I personally don’t see it happening in the immediate future, but then again, I didn’t think I would see millions of people in the street the day after Trump’s inauguration.
I for one would love to be pleasantly surprised, but I’m just one person, and by writing this, I am excusing myself from leading this, but not from potentially participating.
For any adjunct/contingent who’s read this, I have now put the onus of leading or participating in such action upon you. It’s time for you to talk, and act, and plan.
A “Good” Adjunct
I am writing this post to stress that now, as an anti-intellectual and anti-education political environment awaits us, the need for Spring Adjunct/Contingent Action is more important than ever.
Up until the events of February 25th, 2015, with the proposed, yet more modestly realized National Adjunct Walkout Day (there were protests, rallies, teach-ins, but few if any walkouts), Spring actions protesting adjunct labor conditions were few and far between, and usually only coming to protest class cuts and adjunct firings that were more often than not a foregone conclusion. (I took place in such actions as a Grad Student in the early 1990’s).
National Adjunct Walkout Day in part changed adjunct/contingent activism in the Spring in that it led to a smattering of actions nationwide, not as a reaction to an immediate Higher Ed misdecision by either Administrators or politicians, but rather, to draw attention to the growing creep of adjunctification, and with it, the weakening of the nation’s Higher Ed system, and financial and emotional impoverishment of so-called “part-time” Higher Ed faculty who represent a commanding majority of Higher Ed. faculty in general.
By 2016, only a smattering of schools marked the event, although other institutions called for Spring adjunct actions in later months such as March and April. This year, in 2017, it’s unclear who will participate in actions in conjunction with what now being called by some “Adjunct Action Day.”
In the San Diego Area, actions are currently being made to mark the event with rallies and other events on Wednesday, Feb. 22nd, commemorating the fourth Wednesday in February when the event first took place.
I . The Fading Past, but the Present Reality
For many hopeful of some mass workout stoppage which supposedly would show America how the US Higher Ed system would be brought to a crushing halt in a “Day without Adjuncts,” 2015’s National Adjunct Walkout Day was a failure, and those who did lesser actions were simply sellouts.
The event was in no way a failure, unless you were deluded enough to believe, after watching Newsies or Norma Rae too many times, that mass worker actions can be achieved with Hollywood ease. The event brought together both adjuncts who were and weren’t union members, and who were from competing organizations to speak with more or less a single message: that adjunctification and the exploitive practices associated with it must go. In states such as California, where groups like CTA and CFT were able to rally around increasing categorical funding to increase full-time instruction, it meant tens of millions of dollars for more full-time positions (approx. 63 million dollars in California at alone). In addition, it also marked the start of a two-year campaign to guarantee priority rehire rights for California Community College Adjuncts, resulting in the passage of bills AB1690 and SB1379.
The follow-up event, Adjunct Action Day of 2016 in part launched the petition campaign to get an Extension of Prop 30 (a Provision passed in 2012 which now accounts for 15% of community college funding). The rallies in the San Diego Community District helped lead the local union (AFT 1931) chapter to collecting more petition signatures than any other AFT chapter in the state. Similar actions at Southwestern College in Chula Vista resulted in their collection of the 2nd highest total of signatures in the Southern California region for CTA chapters, unheard of when K-12 chapters usually outpace Community College chapters in signature gathering by multiples.
What’s more important is this—the Prop 30 Extension had struggled to get the sufficient numbers to be on the ballot. The actions of Adjunct Action Day, particularly with regard to the San Diego and Southwestern Community College Districts, helped put its numbers over the top, and thus saved 15% of the Community College budget, and 1000’s of adjunct jobs.
In spite of the national political climate, activists here are forging ahead, with things such paid maternity leave for adjuncts, increasing funding for office hours, and so on.
As for the national picture, the threats against DACA recipients, immigrants, Muslims, and the LGBT community, along with a clearly anti-union administration, will hurt adjuncts first and foremost among Higher Ed faculty.
We do not have the luxury to lull ourselves back into apathy; we must act now as, with regard to the incoming Trump administration, it is the Spring of our discontent.
II. Campus Equity Week is a Great Start, but It’s not Enough, and Needs to Be part of an Annual, not a Biennial Plan.
In 2000, the Coalition for Contingent Academic Labor or COCAL established a biennial event called “Campus Equity Week,” which set during the last week in October, was specifically to be week during which various actvities from rallies to teach-ins would take place to bring light to the plight of adjunct/contingent faculty. Over the years, various adjunct groups and faculty unions have held events in conjunction with the week.
Speifically, the San Diego and Southwetern Community College faculty unions placed a renewed focus on these events, doing them on an annual basis sarting from 2014. Because the Coummunity Colleges have a two-year system, and because we work with student groups with high rates of turnover, it is more conducive for us to do these events on a annual basis to establish institutional knowledge of the week. While adjunct issues are still a main focus of the week, we have branched out the events of the week to address issues such as student poverty, school corporitization, and the expanding creep of labor contingency throughout the economic system. By doing this, we get more invovlement with students, classified staff, administrators, and governing board members/trustees.
We use the issues raised during this week to set up campaigns for potential legislative or petition/letter-writing campaigns, which come to fruition in the Spring.
And understand, Spring action should be just that-action. Too often I have heard about such events been scheduled and being reduced to Adjunct “Appreciation” Days. These events are not about “appreciation,” (i.e. providing five-dollar pizzas from Cesar Cesar for an adjunct “dinner”). They’re about challenging adjunctification, and standing up for ourselves.
Without an institutionalized Spring event like an Adjunct Action Day or whatever you, my adjuncts, can come up with, launching many of these campaigns becomes more challenging, and this is why activities like an Adjunct Action Day are essential. Legislatures form legislation and make budgets in late Winter/early Spring. To not have an event until later means you’re being reactive rather than proactive.
That said, because of the vast differences in calendars and issues from not only state-to-state, but system-to-system, and school-to-school, adjunct/contingents at their respective institutions need to schedule Spring actions when it’s best for them. The bigger point is you need to do something.
In closing, know this–we are facing real threats to our working conditions and occupational mission, and there are models out there for successful adjunct organizing. It is not the time for depression, self-pity, or apathy, but action.
“Once unto the breach” my good adjuncts.
A Good Adjunct
With regard to Trump and his educational agenda, there is no clearer symbol of where he wants to go with education than his Secretary of Education pick, Betsy DeVos. Some of you out there have probably received emails from various groups asking you to contact your senators and to tell them to oppose DeVos’s appointment.
But many of you don’t know just how bad a pick she is, or its impact on adjunct/contingent faculty, particularly those who work at public institutions.
First, unlike the students we see in the public system, DeVos was born into tremendous wealth, her father Edgar Prince having been an industrialist who founded the Prince Corporation, an auto parts supplier. She later married Richard Marvin “Dick” DeVos Jr., heir to the Amway fortune. She herself is the product of private Christian Schools, and has never been a student at a public institution. Further, she has no direct experience in public education, either as a teacher, administrator, or even a school board trustee. Ironically, in spite of her elite, privileged, and ideologically narrow upbringing , she asserts of her educational activism that she has been “a fighter for the grassroots.”
Her real claim to fame within the Republican Party is that she has been a tireless party advocate, and more importantly, a heavy fundraiser.
As a self-styled educational reformer, DeVos is a champion of school choice, and favors the use of public funds in the form of school vouchers to allow children to attend public school. Her real motivation for this position is likely driven by her Christian faith.
As for her “success” in achieving educational reform, her record is less that exemplary. Detroit’s charter school system, for which she was in large part responsible, was, in the words of Douglas Harris, a Brookings Institution Fellow and Founding Director of the Education Research Alliance for New Orleans, even acknowledged by educational reformers as “the biggest school reform disaster in the country.” As for her specific actions regarding the Detroit Charter School system, Harris further wrote:
She devised Detroit’s system to run like the Wild West. It’s hardly a surprise that the system, which has almost no oversight, has failed. Schools there can do poorly and still continue to enroll students. Also, after more than a decade of Ms. DeVos’s getting her way on a host of statewide education policies, Michigan has the dubious distinction of being one of five states with declining reading scores.
Perhaps more troubling, especially for those of us in Higher Ed, and particularly adjunct/contingent faculty, is her notion of the US Public Education System as a “dead end,” and, in a thinly-veiled argument for both school choice and the view of public schooling as “an industry,” stated:
As long as education remains a closed system, we will never see the education equivalents of … Facebook, Amazon . . . Wikipedia, or Uber.
Perhaps then, DeVos feels the US education system should aspire to allowing fake information like Facebook, working its employees to death like Amazon, creating reference material from open and questionable sources like Wikipedia, or reducing the entire educational workforce to independent contractors (that’s right, just like adjunct/contingent faculty) like Uber.
Finally. For those of you who care about academic freedom, consider this, Besty DeVos, in describing her motivation for school reform stated:
Our desire is to be in that Shephelah, and to confront the culture in which we all live today in ways that will continue to help advance God’s Kingdom, but not to stay in our own faith territory.
I suppose some could find comfort in the words “outside our own faith territory” except when thinking of what she has said further in this regard:
It goes back to what I mentioned, the concept of really being active in the Shephelah of our culture — to impact our culture in ways that are not the traditional funding the- Christian-organization route, but that really may have greater Kingdom gain in the long run by changing the way we approach things — in this case, the system of education in the country
Shephelah, for those unfamiliar with the term, is a plot of land the Israelites fought over with the Philistines, and the desire to have the land was that he/she who controlled it, would in turn control the people. Another way to think of such thinking is to know it as “Dominionism” which can loosely be defined as the belief that one needs to create a nation governed by Christians based on their interpretation of Biblical Law.
For those Philistines among us, DeVos’s quest for Shephelah should be a cause of grave concern.
As confirmation hearings are soon upon us, it is urgent that you act to oppose the DeVos nomination, that is, if you value Public Education, Worker Rights, and Academic Freedom; DeVos is clearly a threat to all of the above.
A Good Adjunct
It’s already clear that Trump’s plans for “making America great again” didn’t include adjunct/contingent faculty, but, for some, it wasn’t clear that he is going to make our jobs go away.
He most certainly is.
For those of us, such as myself, who teach in the border region, and in particular, teach in the Community College System, significant numbers of our students are immigrants, the children or family members of immigrants, or are American citizens, who for a variety of reasons, a big one being financial, live on the other side of the border and commute to school on a daily basis.
Many other students simply “look” like immigrants, if you’re racist presumption of an immigrant is someone who:
- “Looks” Latino, Arab, African, Asian
- Chooses to speak a language other than English in public
- Wears “ethnic” clothing
- Speaks with an accent
Before he even embarks on the building of his “wall,” likely paid for by cuts to social and educational programs, the hardline stance that Trump promises on immigration will negatively impact enrollment in Community Colleges and Higher Ed nationwide.
Let’s break it down.
1) The Dreamers: As of 2016, there are an estimated 2.1 million undocumented students living in the United States. Between 200,000 and 225,000 are currently enrolled in US colleges. The repeal of the Dream Act will not simply put the enrollment status of the Dreamers in college at risk. Further, if colleges are forced to deny enrollment to these students in the future effects on college enrollment will be severe. Clearly, fewer students will mean fewer sections for adjunct/contingent faculty to teach.
2) The Undocumented Immigrant Population as a whole: There are an estimated 11.2 million undocumented immigrants in the US. One should consider that these are not people who are separate from the American population. They are often married to American citizens, or have American children who depend on them for support. These children in turn rely on the support of the parents so that they can attend college. While the threat of deportation is always a reality, the increasing threat of deportation means that many would-be college students will lose the financial and familial support they need to go to college. Again, fewer students, and fewer sections.
3) Border Militarization: Because of the often low wages in relation to the cost of living in places like San Diego, there are a significant number of American citizens (including several “Anglo” adjuncts I personally know) who live in places like Tijuana and commute to the US to teach on a daily basis. Border crossings can sometimes take up to several hours. Militarizing the border with the threat, not simply of a wall, but with increased scrutiny at border crossings will increase the wait times, and make it harder for students to attend classes.
4) Immigration Enforcement: One need only look back at the passage of bills like AB1070 in Arizona to get a sense of where immigration enforcement can head. This bill, though later amended, allowed for authorities who have “reasonable suspicion” to stop and check a person’s immigration status, and if one couldn’t produce some form of identification could keep them in custody. What exactly constitutes a “reasonable suspicion”? When you have a soon-to-be President who speaks of a blanket ban for Muslims in this country, does this mean wearing a beard or a Hijab?
And if you think this can’t or doesn’t happen, then you should talk to the Latinos riding the San Diego trolley who have been approached by the Border patrol and checked for their status.
Creating a climate of fear and discomfort does not aid enrollment-it deters it.
Several California community college senates and governing boards have already adopted resolutions against cooperating with immigration officials. You should support these resolutions.
If you can’t bring yourself to think about the impact it will have on the people I have mentioned above, consider how it will affect you, because your job may depend upon it.
A Good Adjunct
Since Trump won in November, I knew we (adjunct/contingents) were screwed, but to get at the full degree of just where things would go, it took me to see the latest proposal being pushed out there regarding Trump and federal employees to get the full searing sense of what the outcome might look like.
Understand, that it was a given that Trump, whose own record with unions is deplorable at best, would not only seek to put an end to public employee union agency fees ala the Friedrichs case that was halted with the death of Antonin Scalia last year, but, in a nod to Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker, will seek out National “Right-to-Work” Legislation.
It is also clear, in his railing against “regulations,” that on-the-job worker protections will be seriously rolled back.
But what Trump is truly after is the very notion of worker’s rights, or anything that has to do remotely with the notion of collective bargaining.
Just introduced, the “Promote Accountability and Government Efficiency” Act (H.R. 6278), and sponsored by Todd Rokita (Republican, Indiana 4th District), seeks to do the following, and here I quote for the AFL-CIO Action Network:
- Completely change the federal pay system, and prohibits all pay raises — including annual pay raises — unless you get a 4 or 5 out of 5 performance rating.
- Make all new federal workers “at will,” meaning they can be fired without explanation.
- Allow immediate suspension for current workers for performance or conduct and only ten days for appeal.
- Eliminate official time, so that union representatives can no longer work to protect your pay, your benefits or your job during the work day.
Read the bill for yourself
In case you don’t get it, the passage of such a bill would have trickle down effects. If you can make all federal workers “at will” employees, why not all public employees, and in particular teachers?
Consider that the first provision effectively ends the concept of a COLA, or cost-of-living allowance, so as things get more expensive, your salary may not rise, unless you toady well, or are like that shiny new penny to your evaluator or administrator.
With the second provision, say goodbye to not only tenure, but ultimately the push for priority re-hire rights for Adjunct-Contingent faculty. And understand, this is not just a job issue. Tenure was created to serve as a protection which is at the heart of Higher Education: Academic Freedom.
Imagine, while you’re on vacation over the Summer being told you’re terminated, only to find out you missed the appeal window, because you were unaware. Further, consider that if, even at a single institution, there were just 10-20 cases in a given term, your grievance team would likely be overwhelmed, especially considering they couldn’t do any union work during the day.
And by the way adjuncts, over the past few years dealing with grievance, I’ve seen a number of these cases, as many administrators like to use the “Summer exit plan” to get rid of what they deem as “pesky adjuncts.” They have and will be coming after you.
Number four on the list is effectively a union killer. If you read the bill, it calls for the prohibition of any union activity using, and I quote “any Government property (including office space or computers.” This means, if you have a complaint, you can’t even email me (a union rep) from the office, or use the school email to do so. We also couldn’t meet with you on campus.
You say this is unconstitutional, and a violation of our first amendment rights. Well, now that’s determined by the Supreme Court, whose immediately future justices will be chosen by none other than our Union-hating President Trump.
If there has never been a time for adjuncts, teachers, public employees, and workers in general to not stand up and resist and resist loudly, this is it.
Here’s a first step to take, but it’s not enough.
Adjuncts need to publicly rally on all Campuses to speak our cause and the cause of workers in general. For those of you on other campuses, mass Spring action is not only called for, it’s essential.
Adjunct Action Day At Southwestern College and in the San Diego Community College District is Wednesday, February 22nd. You can bet this will be part of the discussion.
A Good Adjunct
This Geoff Johnson (mixinminao) making an announcement of San Diego Mesa College Campus Equity Week Events.
This is a recent message I got from my friend and colleague Larissa Dorman, who also happens to be a kick-ass organizer for AFT in the UC System:
Labor of Love: Adjunct Stories in Higher Education
Deadline: Thursday, September 1st, 2016 by 6pm PST
Submit to: firstname.lastname@example.org
We are seeking adjuncts’ stories for an edited book for a general audience on what it means to be an adjunct instructor at an American college or university. We are looking for stories that show who adjuncts are, how they became adjuncts, the effects that their working conditions have on their work, and their ideas for fixing the broken university system.
AB 1690, the bill which calls for setting a minimum standard for job security for California Adjunct Community College instructors has made it out of the California Senate Appropriations Committee, and now moves on the floor of the House, the Senate, and then the governor’s desk.
It is highly expected that it will clear the House and Senate, but then nothing is ever certain.
That’s where you come in.
Please sign this petition to Senate Pro Tem Kevin de Leon asking him to help AB 1690 pass off the Senate floor and go to the Governor’s desk… We don’t know if we will ever get this chance again, and the Non-Tenured faculty at community colleges can’t wait any longer for these basic job rights!
Again, if you’re not familiar with the language in AB 1690, here it is:
Let’s make this happen.
A “Good” Adjunct
P.S.: I’m now in the process of preparing a letter to the governor, which I’ll be putting out here, among other places. Look for it.
Here is a link to a sample governor’s letter: AB%201690%20Letter%20To%20The%20Governor%20Template
The following powerpoint has been loosely adopted as the CFT’s Campus Equity Week Organizing Strategy.
My belief is that if we want to create a lasting campaign for adjunct activism which is effective and builds the partnerships we need for success, this is it.
A “Good” Adjunct